You are listening to a Podhoc podcast — a platform where anything can be turned into a Podcast to Learn in Motion.
The concept of originality in doctoral research, particularly in educational and sociological fields, isn't about inventing entirely new theories from scratch. Instead, it's about making a significant and valuable contribution within a specific academic domain. This can manifest in various ways, such as innovative study design, insightful synthesis of existing knowledge, profound implications drawn from analysis, or a unique presentation of research findings. What constitutes originality is therefore fluid, varying across disciplines, programs, and individual projects, but it must always be accompanied by significance to the field.
This thesis claims originality not by portraying Access to Higher Education in Wales as a novel subject, but by offering a fresh and meaningful perspective on its governance, interpretation, and lived experience within Wales's distinct devolved educational context. This is intricately linked to the research questions, which explore stakeholder perceptions of effectiveness, the need for modernization in response to Curriculum for Wales, pathways for enhancement, and learner preparedness for undergraduate study. Collectively, these questions demand an examination of governance, pedagogy, regulation, and policy alignment.
The thesis makes three principal contributions to knowledge, developed cumulatively throughout. Chapter One details the technical and regulatory framework of the Access Diploma. Chapter Two historically situates Access within adult returner and widening participation contexts. Chapter Three establishes the theoretical framework, drawing heavily on Foucault’s work on governmentality, surveillance, and the regulation of conduct.
Chapter Four identifies a literature gap, particularly the scarcity of Wales-specific research on Access governance. Chapters Six and Seven provide the empirical basis through cross-wave themes like changing learner demographics, regulatory role confusion, and assessment inconsistencies. This chapter then synthesizes the conceptual, analytical, and policy-contextual implications, arising from the interaction of historical analysis, theoretical framework, empirical findings, and the Welsh policy context.
First, the thesis contributes conceptually by arguing that Access to Higher Education in Wales functions as a semi-autonomous disciplinary space, governed through regulated autonomy rather than simple top-down control. This is developed theoretically in Chapter Three, using Foucault’s concepts of discipline and governmentality, where regulation operates through direct command, self-regulation, documentation, and quality assurance. Chapter One details the technical underpinnings, showing how national regulation allows providers discretion in curriculum and assessment design.
The empirical basis for this conceptualization is found in Chapter Six, particularly the themes of "Regulatory Role Confusion" and "Assessment Burden and Inconsistencies." Participants describe a system where institutional autonomy is mediated by external expectations, internal quality assurance, and audit practices. This aligns with accounts of "governing at a distance" and professionalism enacted within regulatory structures, reframing Access as a governed educational space where autonomy is real but structured.
This conceptual contribution extends the idea of Access occupying a 'liminal' space between further and higher education. The thesis argues that Access in Wales exists within *regulatory* liminality, operating across sectoral, policy, and governance boundaries. This condition generates a semi-autonomous disciplinary space, helping to explain regulatory drift. Access is governed by a network of actors, operating within a boundary-spanning environment characterized by overlapping responsibilities and negotiated authority.
Broadhead’s discussion of notional learning time, for instance, highlights how administrative changes in credit structure serve as a calculative technology, making learning measurable and governable. This mirrors Foucauldian concerns about quantifying conduct. While Broadhead notes the diploma's duality—widening participation alongside complex standardisation—this thesis shows these tensions are particularly significant in the Welsh context, where inclusivity and learner-centered pedagogy coexist with standardisation.
Second, the thesis contributes analytically by developing the concept of regulatory drift. This occurs when formal frameworks remain, but the responsibility for interpretation and consistency becomes so distributed that variation accumulates across providers, pathways, and sites. It's not an absence of regulation, but a condition where oversight is distant, responsibility is fragmented, and providers must translate broad expectations into local practice without a coherent Wales-specific strategic settlement.
Regulatory drift is theoretically supported by Foucauldian governmentality, explaining how power operates through dispersed practices and institutional routines rather than solely centralized command. Lemke’s work on governmentality, as both material and discursive, supports the claim that regulation is a set of practices organizing educational possibilities. Hodges, Kerfoot, and Gough's research shows how assessment and examination function as technologies of surveillance and regulation, making assessment inconsistency a governance problem.
This analytical contribution is evident in participant accounts of ambiguity over roles, assessment burden, and local variation, leading to materially different assessment regimes for learners of the same nominal qualification. These findings connect to research questions about effectiveness, improvement, and learner preparedness, showing they are inseparable from the regulatory conditions of Access design, delivery, and assessment. Regulatory drift offers a concept to understand fragmented oversight and learner inequity.
The methods of formal assessment clearly illustrate regulatory drift. Assessment burden, particularly in science subjects, emerged as a robust cross-wave theme, with participants describing labor-intensive regimes and disparities between sites. Analytically, these reveal how local interpretive discretion, coupled with unclear oversight, produces materially different learner experiences within the same pathway, shifting the issue from pedagogic preference to educational equity.
Third, the thesis contributes empirically and policy-wise by revealing Access to Higher Education in Wales as a changing and important area within the devolved Welsh education system. The discussion chapter shows a shift in learner demographics, with an increase in under-19 learners and a decline in traditional mature returner participation. This suggests a pressure on Access's historical identity from changes in post-16 education.
Practitioner concerns about younger learners' readiness for the independence and academic demands of Level 3 Access study highlight the evolving nature of the cohort. This diversity, with learners possessing qualifications from GCSEs to postgraduate degrees, significantly affects assessment, curriculum design, pacing, and academic preparation. The contribution lies in showing how demographic trends and regulatory uncertainty create new challenges for course design and learner support.
The policy-contextual contribution highlights that Access in Wales operates under a UK-wide framework but within an increasingly distinct Welsh policy environment. Stakeholders express concerns about the lack of a Wales-specific strategic direction and uneven integration of Welsh-medium elements. This creates a tension between a devolved national policy settlement and a qualification route still largely organized through cross-border arrangements.
The emergence of Medr, while met with both optimism and caution, signifies a potential for a more coherent Welsh-led settlement for Access. Proposals for modularization, credit banking, and stronger Welsh-medium integration suggest reforms are envisioned as a repositioning of Access within Welsh educational priorities. This contribution translates abstract policy discussions into empirically grounded visions of reform stakeholders deem desirable and plausible.
This empirical and policy-contextual contribution is significant for understanding modernization in Access and what meaningful reform would entail. It reveals why Access’s future effectiveness must be considered alongside broader developments in devolved Welsh policy. Access in Wales is not just a pathway to university, but a governance space sensitive to policy, where regulatory ambiguity and uneven assessment raise questions about fairness and its role within Welsh educational priorities.
The thesis's theoretical strength lies in its synthesis of sociological and educational theory. Foucault provides a sociological account of power, while a critical educational perspective addresses pedagogical consequences. This prevents the contribution from being solely sociological or descriptive, showing how governance structures—regulation, audit, accountability—influence teaching, assessment, learner agency, and the very possibilities of transformative learning within Access.
Thank you for listening to this Podhoc podcast.
